Quick Drive: 2017 Nissan Rogue Hybrid Previewed by X-Trail Hybrid

0

Quick Drive: 2017 Nissan Rogue Hybrid Previewed by X-Trail Hybrid

Email This Page

Your email was sent successfully.
Close

Follow Bengt

[% } %]

[% }); %]

]]>

The compact crossover has in recent years become the go-to vehicle for frugal families, and it’s largely replaced the mid-size sedan. Yet hybrid offerings in this class have been especially slim.
With the discontinuation of the Ford Escape Hybrid a few years ago, there hasn’t been anything, in fact; but that’s slated to change with the introduction of the 2016 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid late this year—and, perhaps, next year with the introduction of a 2017 Nissan Rogue Hybrid.
It’s a model that’s not yet confirmed, officially, for the U.S. market, yet it’s one that’s still waiting in the product pipeline—and likely for the 2017 model year.
The U.S. Rogue is quite closely related to the Japan-market X-Trail—which is already on sale in X-Trail Hybrid form, with the latest version of the hybrid system that could potentially be headed for the U.S. And based on a short, half-hour-long driving loop around downtown Yokohama late last month, just after the Tokyo Motor Show, we managed to get a feel for how a Rogue Hybrid might feel if it were to be brought Stateside.
From the Pathfinder Hybrid, made better
The X-Trail Hybrid incorporates a version of the hybrid system used in the Nissan Pathfinder Hybrid, with a continuously variable automatic transmission (CVT) plus an Intelligent Dual Clutch Control system allowing the electric motor alone to move the vehicle under some conditions.
The e-motor system supplements an eco-tuned 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine, making 145 hp and 153 pound-feet of torque.
In the Pathfinder Hybrid, we found real-world mileage to be quite disappointing. Yet here, because of the stronger 30-kW motor (versus just 15-kW in the Pathfinder) making a maximum 118 pound-feet of torque, plus a much lighter vehicle otherwise, there’s greater promise as it seems possible for a significantly wider range of electric-only operation.
And that’s exactly what we observed. We noted electric-only operation at up to around 45 km/h (28 mph) under steady-state, mostly level conditions—and we observed the gasoline motor, as with the Pathfinder and its cousin, the Infiniti QX80 Hybrid, detaching and powering down, at higher speeds.
The high point of the driving experience with this system is that you can actually feel the contribution of the electric motor in transitory response—when you go to press the accelerator a little bit more to ease past a car in an adjacent lane, for instance. It helps erase the delay in power delivery that we’ve seen with many of Nissan’s four-cylinder CVT applications in this situation.
On the other hand, there is still a significant delay if you ask for a quick, all-out passing maneuver; then it actually feels sluggish.
The low point of the driving experience was the regenerative braking, which still felt at odds with the CVT system’s torque-converter coordination in the last five mph or so of deceleration.
Source: CarConnection
{$excerpt:n}

DrivePulse is your source for new car reviews, research, ratings, used car research and the latest industry automotive news. Connect and follow us today!

Leave A Reply